|
AET Cluster Rule Submission Submitted to U.S.
EPA
Table of Contents Section
1: Section
2: Section
3: Section
4: Section
5: Section
6: Section
7:
Executive SummaryThe Alliance for Environmental Technology (AET) strongly supports EPA's long term goals which include improved water quality, elimination of ecologically significant bioaccumulation, and the elimination of fish consumption advisories. AET strongly supports complete substitution of chlorine dioxide in the first stage of bleaching independent of the extent of delignification of unbleached pulp as a technology basis to achieve such goals. This opinion is based on extensive peer-reviewed science and is in accordance with international scientific opinion.
Improved Water QualitySection 1 of this submission, "A Review and Assessment of the Ecological Risks Associated with the Use of Chlorine Dioxide," was prepared by a panel of esteemed scientists and submitted to the U.S. EPA at the February 10, 1994 public hearing. The report clearly demonstrates that complete substitution of chlorine dioxide in the first stage of pulp bleaching provides considerable environmental benefits. The panel of scientists reached a unanimous opinion. Based on the existing available data, the panel concluded that chlorinated organics from mills bleaching with chlorine dioxide, employing secondary treatment and with receiving water dilutions typical of most mills in North America, present an insignificant risk to the environment (Solomon et al., 1994). This opinion was reached independent of the extent of delignification of the unbleached pulp prior to bleaching.
Elimination of Ecologically Significant BioaccumulationSection 2 of this submission, "An Assessment of the Formation of 2378-TCDD and 2378-TCDF when Chlorine Dioxide is the Oxidizing Agent in the First Stage of Chemical Pulp Bleaching," was prepared by a panel of esteemed scientists and submitted to Dr. Robert Huggett, U.S. EPA, May 17, 1996. The report clearly demonstrates the capability of complete substitution of chlorine dioxide to eliminate ecologically significant bioaccumulation.The panel of scientists reached a unanimous opinion with the following conclusions:
N.B. This opinion was reached independent of the extent of delignification of the unbleached pulp prior to bleaching.
Elimination of Fish Consumption AdvisoriesSection 3 of this submission, "Eco-System Recovery: Liftings of Fish Consumption Advisories for Dioxin Downstream of U.S. Pulp Mills," was prepared by the Alliance for Environmental Technology and submitted to Jeff Bigler, U.S. EPA Office of Water, August 13, 1996.The report, an analysis of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Listing of Fish and Wildlife Consumption Advisories (NLFWA), reveals three important findings regarding fish consumption advisories for dioxin. First, the number of waterbodies under a dioxin advisory represent 2 percent of the total number of affected waterbodies in the U.S. According to the EPA, there are currently 1,740 waterbodies under some type of advisory restricting fish or shellfish consumption. Of this total, 37 waterbodies in select pulp and paper states are under a dioxin advisory. Second, of the 37 waterbodies with a dioxin advisory, only 18 are downstream of U.S. pulp mills, amounting to less than 2 percent of the total 1,740 affected waterbodies. Third, the small number of waterbodies under a dioxin advisory is steadily diminishing. Since 1991, 13 states have lifted a total of 17 dioxin advisories from waterbodies downstream of U.S. pulp mills. Process changes in pulp manufacture, including the increased use of chlorine dioxide as a bleaching agent, have markedly reduced dioxin discharges and tissue levels in fish living in mill receiving waters.
Chronic ToxicityAET is concerned that EPA has made assertions in the "Notice of Availability Federal Register Vol. 61, No. 136 p. 36835-36858" (hereinafter referred to as "the Notice") that there are incremental environmental benefits such as "reduced chronic toxicity" attributable to the use of extended delignification. AET does not support EPA's equivocal, misleading, loosely-worded and incorrect assertions that are in conflict with peer-reviewed science and international scientific opinion. Section 4 of this submission is a summary of arguments challenging the assertions that a reduction in chronic toxicity:
AOX as an Indicator of Polychlorinated CompoundsAET is concerned that EPA has made assertions in "the Notice" that "final AOX loading is an appropriate measure of the performance of in-process and end-of-pipe technologies in reducing the chlorinated organic pollutants such as dioxin and furan found in wastewaters discharged by this industry" and "thus, EPA expects that process changes and treatment technologies implemented to reduce AOX discharges at the end of the pipe will in turn further reduce the likelihood of the formation and discharge of these chlorinated organic pollutants." Section 5 of this submission is a summary of arguments challenging these assertions which are in conflict with peer-reviewed science and international scientific opinion.AET urges EPA to eliminate such scientifically flawed notions from any preamble or text in the development of final effluent guidelines.
Totally Chlorine-free TechnologyAET is concerned that despite international peer-reviewed scientific analysis that show totally chlorine-free technologies provide no additional environmental benefit compared to elemental chlorine-free technologies, and that product quality does not meet today's technologies nor today's product requirements, EPA continues to "strongly encourage further ... implementation of TCF technologies and products." Section 6 of this submission is a summary of comparisons which show there is no difference between the environmental impact of ECF and TCF-based effluents.Since there is no environmental justification for implementation of TCF technologies, AET urges EPA to eliminate such encouragement from any preamble or text in the development of final effluent guidelines.
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4Comments Reguarding: "Environmental Benefits of Extended Delignification"
In "the Notice" on page 36838, EPA makes the following statement: "The incremental environmental benefits that the Agency can attribute to the use of extended delignification (e.g., OD or extended cooking) in addition to complete (100 percent) substitution include reduced chronic toxicity to some aquatic life species. This reduced chronic toxicity is probably attributable to a reduction in mass loadings of certain non-chlorinated compounds that are indirectly measured by the bulk analytical parameter chemical oxygen demand (COD). The reduced chronic toxicity may also reflect an incremental reduction in the potential for formation of dioxin (2,3,7,8 TCDD) and furan (2,3,7,8 TCDF), which at many mills is no longer measurable by current analytical methods at the end-of-pipe, and a reduction in mass loadings of all chlorinated compounds which can be measured by the bulk analytical parameter adsorbable organic halides (AOX)." The foregoing statement is not supported by peer-reviewed science nor international scientific opinion and fundamental chemistry. The following analysis examines each of the assertions in the foregoing statement.
COD and Chronic ToxicityEPA makes the statement that reduced chronic toxicity attributable to extended delignification is probably attributable to a reduction in mass loadings of certain non-chlorinated compounds that are indirectly measured by the bulk analytical parameter chemical oxygen demand (COD).COD is the oxygen equivalent of the organic matter in pulp and paper effluent samples that is oxidizable by chromic acid. Typically COD is the chemically oxidizable organic chemicals released from the wood in pulping and bleaching. The EPA's conclusion appears to be based partly on a technical paper by Folke, 1995. This particular paper refers to a concept called "response index" to evaluate different pulp and paper mill effluent influences in model ecosystems. The "response index" is a measure of the intensity in change of the response of a parameter studied. The developers of the "response index" (Lehtinen et al., 1992) have said: "the procedure should be regarded as a semiquantitative integration of the results obtained. ... The method must be regarded as relatively subjective since the significance of the responses obtained on different biological levels is still not understood..." Folke's analysis is flawed for the following reasons:
Martel et al. (1994) investigated the EROD-inducing potential of biologically treated mill effluents. While many effluents did not cause statistically significant EROD induction, for those that did, the potential could not be linked to a particular bleaching or pulping process. There was no significant difference between mills with and without extended delignification. Priha, (1996) investigated the final treated effluent from 15 Finnish pulp mills using five laboratory sub-lethal (chronic) and lethal toxicity tests. Importantly, the study says (underline added for emphasis): "Comparison of the biological responses and effluent monitoring parameters shows that biological impact cannot be predicted from either the content of organic matter, measured as BOD and COD or the AOX content." "... likewise, a high COD level did not indicate a high biological response..." Potential for Dioxin Formation and Chronic ToxicityEPA makes the statement that "reduced chronic toxicity" may also reflect an incremental reduction in the potential for formation of dioxin (2378-TCDD) and furan (2378-TCDF) attributable to extended delignification.This argument has fundamental flaws. In the first case EPA asserts that the potential for formation of dioxin and furan is decreased with extended delignification. This notion does not withstand scientific scrutiny. An examination of final effluent from 17 kraft mills for dioxin and furan (Shariff et al., 1996) using the best detection techniques available, showed there was no difference in final effluent values for mills using ECF technology with or without extended delignification. Furthermore, a proposed model explaining the lack of formation of such compounds with ECF bleaching, determined that the potential for formation is a function of the ratio of atomic chlorine to the lignin content of the unbleached pulp. The potential for formation is not governed by the absolute value of the lignin content of the unbleached pulp. In other words, the potential for formation is independent of the extent of delignification of the unbleached pulp. In the second case, in the data presented in EPA's supporting document, "Pulp and Paper Mill Data Available for BAT Limitations Development," specifically Table 3.9 p. 3-12, neither dioxin nor furan was detected at mills operating without extended delignification. EPA notes that there are examples of ECF operation indicating that detectable concentrations of dioxin and can be generated in bleach plant effluents, (Section XI: (c) p. 36848). However, where dioxin and/or furan was detected, the mills were operating with extended delignification (Table 3-9, p. 3-12 "Pulp and Paper Mill Data Available for BAT Limitations Development"). Based on this observation, one could argue perhaps there is greater potential for dioxin formation with extended delignification. Casting that notion aside, the more likely explanation is high precursor levels as discussed in the model proposed by Shariff et al. (1996). Shariff et al. (1996), also examined the potential ecological response from ECF mills (with or without extended delignification). The conclusion reached was: "... no adverse effects caused by PCDD/Fs in the receiving ecosystem should be expected from effluents discharged by mills using chlorine dioxide as the only oxidizing agent in the first stage of bleaching..." AOX and Chronic ToxicityEPA makes the statement that "reduced chronic toxicity" may also reflect a reduction in mass loadings of all chlorinated compounds which can be measured by the bulk analytical parameter adsorbable organic halides (AOX).The hypothesis that AOX loadings have a relationship with chronic toxicity has been examined extensively by the international scientific community and has been proven to be false as noted in the following peer-reviewed publications. Solomon et al. (1993) after examining the ecological risks associated with the use of chlorine dioxide for the bleaching of pulp, independent of the extent of delignification, made the following conclusion: "... chlorinated organics from mills bleaching with chlorine dioxide, employing secondary treatment and with receiving water dilutions typical of most mills in North America, present an insignificant risk to the environment..." AxegÔrd et. al., (1993) in a review of environmental impact of bleaching effluents reached the following conclusion: "... No relationship between AOX and environmental effects has been found at the current low AOX levels in effluents from chlorine dioxide bleaching..." Tana et al., (1996) in a review of the aquatic environmental impact of pulping and bleaching operations reached the following conclusion: "Toxic responses caused by whole mill effluents from modern mills (AOX below 1.5 kg/ton pulp) are generally very low, and show no variation related to the actual AOX release. This indicates that, at least in this category of mills, the chlorinated organics in the effluents do not contribute significantly to the toxicity of the effluents..." Priha, (1996) investigated the final treated effluent from 15 Finnish pulp mills using five laboratory sub-lethal (chronic) and lethal toxicity tests. Importantly, the study says (underline added for emphasis): "Comparison of the biological responses and effluent monitoring parameters shows that biological impact cannot be predicted from either the content of organic matter, measured as BOD and COD or the AOX content." McCubbin and Folke (1995) in an examination of the significance of AOX reached the following conclusions: "... AOX discharges from modern mills cannot be correlated with environmental effect..." "... the quantities of AOX discharged by current mills are environmentally insignificant..." O'Connor et al., (1993) examined laboratory bioassay response and AOX content of pulp and paper mill effluents and reached the following conclusion: "... The absence of a significant correlation between chronic toxicity and AOX, AOX < 1000, or EOX and the fact that unbleached and bleached kraft mill effluent exhibited similar chronic toxicities, strongly indicate that the group parameters for chlorinated organic compounds are not good predictors of bioassay response for either primary or secondary treated bleached kraft mill effluent ..." Thus the EPA's contention that "reduced chronic toxicity may also reflect a reduction in mass loadings of all chlorinated compounds which can be measured by the bulk analytical parameter adsorbable organic halides (AOX)" runs contrary to the entire body of published international scientific investigations. Section 5Comments Regarding:
"Relationship Between AOX Discharges and Formation of Dioxin and Furan and Polychlorinated Phenolic Compounds"EPA has made assertions in "the Notice" that: "final AOX loading is an appropriate measure of the performance of in-process and end-of-pipe technologies in reducing the chlorinated organic pollutants such as dioxin and furan found in wastewaters discharged by this industryî and ñthus, EPA expects that process changes and treatment technologies implemented to reduce AOX discharges at the end of the pipe will in turn further reduce the likelihood of the formation and discharge of these chlorinated organic pollutants." The statement that AOX is a measure of the chlorinated organic compounds in waste water is true. However, the notion that it is also a measure of the likelihood of the formation and discharge of dioxins and furans and polychlorinated phenolic compounds is not supported by peer-reviewed science nor international scientific opinion and fundamental chemistry. Berry et al. (1991) examined the relationship between AOX formation and the formation of dioxin and furan and polychlorinated phenolic compounds. The following conclusions were reached: "... We have observed that the response of the group parameter AOX to process change is decidedly different from that of the polychlorinated organic material... In each case, AOX is essentially linearly related to the chlorine multiple, while the relationships for the representatives of the polychlorinated organic material are considerably more complex and show a comparably greater rate of reduction than AOX as the chlorine multiple is reduced..." Shariff et al. (1996) examined the potential for formation of dioxin and furan with chlorine dioxide bleaching. Their analysis of final mill effluents showed no difference in presence/absence of such compounds independent of the extent of delignification and therefore independent of the extent of AOX discharge. Furthermore, their analysis confirmed that the likelihood of formation of such compounds is not governed by the AOX discharge as asserted by EPA but by the ratio of atomic chlorine to the lignin content of the unbleached pulp (independent of the extent of delignification). This work confirms the findings and conclusions of Berry et al. (1993).
Section 6
Comments Regarding:"Encouragement of Implementation of Totally Chlorine-free Technologies" In "the Notice", EPA makes the following statements: "... Only one U.S. bleached papergrade kraft mill employs a TCF process, and it produces a market pulp of somewhat less than full market pulp brightness..." "... European mills have achieved at or near full market brightness for limited periods..." " ...The limited range of papergrade TCF products currently produced and sold in the U.S. market indicates that TCF is not yet available to make the full range of products produced by ECF or similar chlorine-based processes. Nonetheless, EPA continues to strongly encourage further development and implementation of TCF technologies and products..." AET is concerned that EPA is "strongly" encouraging implementation of TCF. International scientific opinion and peer reviewed science shows there is no additional environmental benefit compared to ECF-based technology. Therefore, it seems inappropriate to encourage the implementation of a technology which has no additional environmental benefit. This opinion is supported by the following investigations. Tana et al., (1996) in a review of the aquatic environmental impact of pulping and bleaching operations reached the following conclusions: "...A comparison of the toxic responses of bleach plant and whole mill effluents from mills using different schemes for non-chlorine bleaching, i.e., ECF versus TCF bleaching, shows that neither technical concept invariably produces effluents with lower toxic potency. Thus, according to studies made to date, ECF and TCF bleaching are not possible to separate in terms of their potential to produce detrimental effects in the aquatic ecosystem..." Grahn et. al. (1995) in an examination of bleach plant and whole mill effluents from the same mill operating ECF and TCF came to the following conclusion: "... it may be concluded that no clearcut differences in biological effect-inducing potential was found between effluents from production of ECF-pulp and TCF-pulp. As a final conclusion, it may thus be stated that the overall effect picture was weak and no significant differences in the power to produce long-term toxicity at the ecosystem level was demonstrated between the effluents from the two bleaching concepts..." Priha, (1996) investigated the final treated effluent from 15 Finnish pulp mills using five laboratory sub-lethal (chronic) and lethal toxicity tests. Importantly, the study says: "... No systematic differences in biological activity between effluents treated in aerated lagoons or activated sludge plants could be detected. Likewise, the bleaching concept did not explain the variations in biological responses..." Nelson et al., (1995) investigated biotreated laboratory bleaching effluent from 4 different bleaching concepts, one ECF and three TCF and their biological response using five marine bioassays. Importantly, the study says: "... the treated ECF and TCF bleach filtrates showed similar toxicity to all species except Nitzschia, where the treated TCF effluent was more toxic..."
Section 7References
|
|||||